Hugh Scott Hugh Scott's Profile Page

Hugh Scott Hugh Scott

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Neuester und gültiger ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test VCE Motoren-Dumps und ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN neueste Testfragen für die IT-Prüfungen

Möchten Sie diePECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Prüfung einmalig bestehen? PrüfungFrage kann Ihren Wunsch erfüllen und Ihre beste Wahl sein. Bei uns werden wir Ihre Forderungen erfüllen. Nachdem Sie unsere Produkte von ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierung gekauft haben, werden wir Ihnen eine einjährige Aktualisierung versprechen. Falls Sie die ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Prüfung leider nicht bestehen, geben wir Ihnen eine volle Rücherstattung.

Vielleicht mit zahlreichen Übungen fehlt Ihnen noch die Sicherheit für PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Prüfung. Falls Sie nach dem Kauf unserer Prüfungsunterlagen leider nicht PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN bestehen, bieten wir Ihnen eine volle Rückerstattung. Aber wir glauben, dass unsere Prüfungssoftware, die unseren Kunden eine Bestehensrate von fast 100% angeboten hat, wird Ihre Erwartungen nicht enttäuschen!

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN German <<

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Originale Fragen - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsfragen

Wenn Sie Dumps zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung von PrüfungFrage kaufen, versprechen wir Ihnen, dass Sie 100% die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen können. Sonst zahlen wir Ihnen die gesammte Summe zurück.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q357-Q362):

357. Frage
當審核團隊的另一位成員向您尋求澄清時，您正在進行第三方監督審核。他們被要求評估組織對控制 5.7 - 威脅情報的應用。他們知道這是 2022 年版 ISO/IEC 中引入的新控制措施之一
27001，他們希望確保正確審核控制。
他們準備了一份清單來協助他們進行審核，並希望您確認他們計劃的活動符合控制要求。
下列哪三個選項代表有效的審計追蹤？

A. 我將確保將產生威脅情報的任務分配給組織的內部稽核團隊
B. 我將確保採取適當措施，向最高管理階層通報目前威脅情報安排的有效性
C. 我將回顧如何收集和評估與資訊安全威脅相關的資訊以產生威脅情報
D. 我將確保組織的風險評估流程從有效的威脅情報開始
E. 我將檢視組織的威脅情報流程，並確保對此進行完整記錄
F. 我將與高階主管交談，以確保所有員工都意識到報告威脅的重要性
G. 我將確定在威脅情報的生成中是否使用內部和外部資訊來源
H. 我將檢查是否積極使用威脅情報來保護組織資訊資產的機密性、完整性和可用性

Antwort: E,G,H

Begründung:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control 5.7 requires an organization to establish and maintain a threat intelligence process to identify and evaluate information security threats that are relevant to its ISMS scope and objectives1. The organization should use internal and external sources of information, such as vulnerability databases, threat feeds, industry reports, etc., to produce threat intelligence that can be used to support risk assessment and treatment, as well as other information security activities1. Therefore, when auditing the organization's application of control 5.7, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Three options that represent valid audit trails for verifying control 5.7 are:
* I will review the organisation's threat intelligence process and will ensure that this is fully documented:
This option is valid because it can provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process that is consistent with its ISMS scope and objectives. It can also verify that the process is documented according to clause 7.5 of ISO/IEC 27001:20221.
* I will check that threat intelligence is actively used to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the organisation's information assets: This option is valid because it can provide evidence of how the organization has used threat intelligence to support its risk assessment and treatment, as well as other information security activities, such as incident response, awareness, or monitoring. It can also verify that the organization has achieved its information security objectives according to clause 6.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:20221.
* I will determine whether internal and external sources of information are used in the production of threat intelligence: This option is valid because it can provide evidence of how the organization has used various sources of information, such as vulnerability databases, threat feeds, industry reports, etc., to produce threat intelligence that is relevant and reliable. It can also verify that the organization has complied with the requirement of control 5.7 of ISO/IEC 27001:20221.
The other options are not valid audit trails for verifying control 5.7, as they are not related to the control or its requirements. For example:
* I will speak to top management to make sure all staff are aware of the importance of reporting threats:
This option is not valid because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process or used threat intelligence to support its ISMS activities. It may be related to another control or requirement regarding information security awareness or communication, but not specifically to control 5.7.
* I will ensure that the task of producing threat intelligence is assigned to the organisation s internal audit team: This option is not valid because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process or used threat intelligence to support its ISMS activities. It may also contradict the requirement for auditor independence and objectivity, as recommended by ISO 19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems.
* I will ensure that the organisation's risk assessment process begins with effective threat intelligence:
This option is not valid because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process or used threat intelligence to support its ISMS activities. It may also imply a prescriptive approach to risk assessment that is not consistent with ISO/IEC 27005:
20183, which provides guidelines for information security risk management.
* I will review how information relating to information security threats is collected and evaluated to produce threat intelligence: This option is not valid because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process or used threat intelligence to support its ISMS activities. It may also be too vague or broad to be an effective audit trail, as it does not specify what criteria or methods are used for collecting and evaluating information.
* I will ensure that appropriate measures have been introduced to inform top management as to the effectiveness of current threat intelligence arrangements: This option is not valid because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a threat intelligence process or used threat intelligence to support its ISMS activities. It may be related to another control or requirement regarding management review or performance evaluation, but not specifically to control
5.7.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, ISO
/IEC 27005:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security risk management

358. Frage
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，負責對專門從事機密文件和可移動媒體安全處置的組織進行第三方認證審核。文件和媒體都被軍用級設備粉碎，因此無法重建原始文件。
審核進展順利，距離末次會議還有 30 分鐘，您正要開始撰寫審核報告。此時，組織的一名員工敲響了您的門，詢問是否可以與您交談。他們告訴您，當事情變得繁忙時，她的經理會告訴她使用較低等級的工業碎紙機，因為該組織擁有更多此類碎紙機並且運行速度更快。受審核方沒有告知您這些機器的存在或使用情況。
選擇三個選項來決定您應如何回應此訊息。

A. 取消審核報告的製作，轉而審查組織與其客戶的合同，以確定他們是否允許使用較低等級的機器
B. 由於組織尚未公開其流程，因此提出不符合 8.1 營運規劃與控制的要求
C. 延長認證審核持續時間，以騰出更多時間來審核較低等級機器的使用情況
D. 根據已發現的其他信息，考慮是否需要在 4 週內進行後續審核
E. 向管理審核計劃的個人建議您在認證之前進行進一步審核的任何建議
F. 與受審核方核實在某些情況下是否使用了較低等級的機器
G. 什麼都不做。所有審核均基於樣本，您採集的樣本不包括較低等級機器的計劃審查

Antwort: D,E,F

Begründung:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 8.1, the organization must plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet the information security requirements, and to implement the actions determined in clause 6.1. The organization must also ensure that the outsourced processes are controlled or influenced. According to control A.5.24, the organization must establish and maintain an information security incident management process that includes reporting information security events and weaknesses. Therefore, the use of lower grade machines for the secure disposal of confidential documents and media could pose a significant information security risk and a potential breach of contract with the clients. The auditor should respond to this information by:
A . Advising the individual managing the audit programme of any recommendation by you to conduct a further audit prior to certification. This is in accordance with ISO/IEC 27006:2022 clause 7.4.3, which states that the audit team leader shall report to the certification body any situation that may significantly affect the audit conclusions or the certification decision, and propose any necessary changes to the audit plan.
C . Considering the need for a subsequent audit within 4 weeks based on the additional information that has come to light. This is in accordance with ISO/IEC 27006:2022 clause 7.5.2, which states that the audit team leader shall review the audit findings and any other appropriate information collected during the audit to determine the audit conclusions, and to identify any need for a subsequent audit.
G . Verifying with the auditee that lower grade machines are used in certain circumstances. This is in accordance with ISO/IEC 27006:2022 clause 7.4.2, which states that the audit team leader shall ensure that the audit is conducted in accordance with the audit plan, and that any changes to the plan are agreed upon and documented.
The other options are not appropriate responses, as they either ignore the information, exceed the scope of the audit, or prematurely raise a nonconformity without sufficient evidence. For example:
B . Cancelling the production of the audit report and instead reviewing the organization's contracts with its clients to determine whether they have permitted the use of lower grade machines. This is not a suitable response, as it would delay the audit process and the certification decision, and it would involve reviewing documents that are outside the scope of the ISMS audit. The auditor should focus on verifying the information security risk assessment and treatment process, and the information security incident management process, as they relate to the use of lower grade machines.
D . Doing nothing. All audits are based on a sample and the sample you took did not include a planned review of the lower grade machines. This is not a suitable response, as it would disregard a significant information security risk and a potential nonconformity that could affect the audit conclusions and the certification decision. The auditor should follow up on the information provided by the employee and verify its validity and impact.
E . Extending the certification audit duration to create additional time to audit the use of the lower grade machines. This is not a suitable response, as it would disrupt the audit schedule and the availability of the audit team and the auditee. The auditor should report the situation to the certification body and propose any necessary changes to the audit plan, such as conducting a subsequent audit.
F . Raising a nonconformity against 8.1 Operational Planning and Control as the organization has not been open about its processes. This is not a suitable response, as it would be based on a single source of information that has not been verified or corroborated. The auditor should collect sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support any nonconformity, and should also consider the root cause and the severity of the nonconformity.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clauses 8.1 and Annex A control A.5.24
ISO/IEC 27006:2022, clauses 7.4.2, 7.4.3, and 7.5.2
[PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor], pages 18-19, 23-24 A Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting an ISO 27001 Internal Audit ISO 27001 - Annex A.16: Information Security Incident Management

359. Frage
您是 ISMS 審計團隊負責人，負責在客戶的資料中心進行後續審計。
現場兩天后，您得出結論，在促使進行後續審核的最初 12 項輕微不符合項和 1 項重大不符合項中，只有 1 項輕微不符合項仍未解決。
選擇您可以採取的動作的四個選項。

A. 在一項未解決的輕微不合格項被清除後，預約另一次現場後續審核以對其進行審查
B. 建議管理審核計畫的個人就突出的不合格項所做的任何決定
C. 與受審核方/審核客戶同意如何清除剩餘的不合格項、何時以及如何驗證其清除
D. 建議暫停該組織的認證，因為該組織未能在商定的時間內實施商定的糾正措施和糾正措施
E. 告知受審核方您將安排線上審核來處理突出的不合格項
F. 記下所取得的進展，但保持審核開放，直到所有糾正措施都被清除
G. 結束後續審核，因為組織已證明其致力於清除提出的不合格項
H. 建議下次監督審核時處理未解決的輕微不符合項

Antwort: B,C,G,H

Begründung:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 requires the audit team leader to conduct a follow-up audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee in response to the nonconformities identified during a previous audit1. The follow-up audit should be conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and should result in a conclusion on the status of the nonconformities and any remaining issues1. Therefore, when conducting a follow-up audit, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has cleared most of the nonconformities, including the major one, and only one minor nonconformity remains outstanding. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. Therefore, this finding does not prevent or preclude the continuation of certification, as long as it is addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit, which is a regular audit conducted by the certification body to confirm the ongoing conformity and effectiveness of an ISMS3.
Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has demonstrated commitment and capability to implement corrective actions for the nonconformities identified during the previous audit. The auditor should agree with the auditee/audit client on a realistic, achievable, and effective corrective action plan for the remaining nonconformity, including a clear deadline and verification method. The auditor should also document this agreement in the follow-up audit report1.
Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to conducting and reporting the follow-up audit. The auditor should advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity, such as recommending its closure at the next surveillance audit or agreeing on a corrective action plan with the auditee/audit client. The auditor should also provide sufficient information and evidence to support their decision1.
Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the organisation has achieved satisfactory results in the follow-up audit. The auditor should close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised by implementing effective corrective actions for most of them and agreeing on a plan for the remaining one. The auditor should also communicate the follow-up audit conclusion to the auditee/audit client and other relevant parties1.

360. Frage
當應用於 ISO 19011 中所述的內部稽核計畫管理流程時，哪兩項活動與計畫-執行-檢查-行動循環的「檢查」階段一致？

A. 更新內部審核計劃
B. 進行內部審核
C. 檢討內部稽核結果的趨勢
D. 驗證內部稽核計畫的有效性
E. 建立基於風險的內部稽核計劃
F. 定義每次內部審核的審核標準和範圍
G. 保留內部審核記錄

Antwort: C,D

Begründung:
The Check stage of the PDCA cycle involves monitoring and measuring the performance of the process and comparing it with the planned objectives and criteria. In the context of managing an internal audit programme, this stage includes verifying the effectiveness of the internal audit programme by evaluating whether it meets its objectives, scope, and criteria, and whether it is implemented in accordance with ISO 19011 guidelines1. It also includes reviewing the trends in internal audit results by analyzing the data collected from the audits, such as audit findings, nonconformities, corrective actions, opportunities for improvement, and customer feedback1. Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

361. Frage
場景 7：Lawsy 是一家領先的律師事務所，在新澤西州和紐約市設有辦公室。它擁有 50 多名律師，為商業法、智慧財產權、銀行和金融服務領域的客戶提供完善的法律服務。他們相信，由於他們致力於實施資訊安全最佳實踐並跟上技術發展的步伐，他們在市場上佔據了有利的地位。
Lawsy 已經嚴格實施、評估和進行 ISMS 內部審核兩年了。
現在，他們已向知名且值得信賴的認證機構ISMA申請ISO/IEC 27001認證。
在第一階段審核期間，審核小組審查了實施過程中所建立的所有 ISMS 文件。
他們還審查和評估了管理審查和內部審計的記錄。
Lawsy 提交了證據記錄，表明在必要時對不合格項採取了糾正措施，因此審核組約談了內部審核員。訪談透過提供對內部稽核計畫和程序的詳細了解，驗證了內部稽核的充分性和頻率。
審計小組繼續驗證戰略文件，包括資訊安全政策和風險評估標準。在資訊安全政策審查期間，團隊注意到描述治理框架（即資訊安全政策）的記錄資訊與程序之間存在不一致。
儘管允許員工將筆記型電腦帶到工作場所之外，但 Lawsy 並沒有製定有關在這種情況下使用筆記型電腦的程序。此政策僅提供有關筆記型電腦使用的一般資訊。該公司依靠員工的常識來保護筆記型電腦中儲存的資訊的機密性和完整性。該問題已記錄在第一階段審計報告中。
完成第一階段審核後，審核組長準備了審核計劃，其中闡述了審核目標、範圍、標準和程序。
在第二階段審核期間，審核小組約談了資安經理，資安經理起草了資訊安全政策。他透過指出 Lawsy 每三個月舉辦一次強制性資訊安全培訓和意識課程來證明第一階段中確定的問題的合理性。
面談後，審核小組檢查了 15 份員工培訓記錄（共 50 份），得出的結論是 Lawsy 符合 ISO/IEC 27001 有關培訓和意識的要求。為了支持這個結論，他們影印了檢查過的員工訓練記錄。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
根據情境 7，Lawsy 在開始第二階段審核之前該做什麼？

A. 定義可以組合哪些審核測試計畫來驗證合規性
B. 與認證機構審核並確認審核計劃
C. 第一階段審核的審核結果進行品質審核

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Prior to the initiation of stage 2 audit, Lawsy should review and confirm the audit plan with the certification body. This ensures that both parties agree on the objectives, scope, and procedures for the stage 2 audit, thus aligning expectations and facilitating a smoother audit process.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems

362. Frage
......

Wenn Sie sich noch anstrengend um die ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung bemühen, dann kann PrüfungFrage in diesem Moment Ihnen helfen, Problem zu lösen. PrüfungFrage bietet Ihnen Schulungsunterlagen von hoher Qualität, damit Sie die Prüfung bestehen und exzellentes Mitglied der PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierung werden können. Wenn Sie sich entscheiden, durch die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung sich zu verbessern, dann wählen Sie bitte PrüfungFrage. PrüfungFrage zu wählen ist keinesfalls nicht falsch. Unser PrüfungFrage verspricht, dass Sie beim ersten Versuch die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen und somit das Zertifikat bekommen können. So können Sie sich sicher verbessern.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Originale Fragen: https://www.pruefungfrage.de/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-dumps-deutsch.html

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN German PC Test Engine können Sie in Ihren Computer herunterladen (Vorsicht, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN German Sie können daran zweifeln, wie wir Ihnen garantieren können, PrüfungFrage ist eine Website, die Ihnen Kenntnise zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung liefert, Wenn Sie einen Wettbewerbsvorteil gegenüber Ihren Kollegen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt gewinnen möchten, wählen Sie bitte unsere ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Originale Fragen - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Pass4sure Prüfung Dumps, wir stehen hinter Ihnen und helfen Ihnen, Ihre Karriereziele zu erreichen und eine bessere Zukunft zu bringen.

Und Eduard wollte nicht davon gesprochen haben, weil alles wie von selbst entspringen, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN überraschen und natürlich erfreuen sollte, Mit jedem Tag wurde dieses Rote größer und größer, und endlich konnte man sehen, was es war.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Pass4sure Dumps & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Sichere Praxis Dumps

PC Test Engine können Sie in Ihren Computer herunterladen (Vorsicht, Sie können daran zweifeln, wie wir Ihnen garantieren können, PrüfungFrage ist eine Website, die Ihnen Kenntnise zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsprüfung liefert.

Wenn Sie einen Wettbewerbsvorteil gegenüber Ihren ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Zertifizierungsfragen Kollegen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt gewinnen möchten, wählen Sie bitte unsere PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Pass4sure Prüfung Dumps, wir stehen hinter Ihnen ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Fragen&Antworten und helfen Ihnen, Ihre Karriereziele zu erreichen und eine bessere Zukunft zu bringen.

Diese zufriedenstellende Zahl zeigt wie erfolgreich die Vorbereitung durch unsere ausgezeichnete ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Trainingsmaterialien: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) ist.